BusyTeacher.org

The most rewarding part of language learning, for many students, comes at that moment of spontaneous, unrehearsed production.

They’ve learned the vocabulary and the structures, and can pass the tests, but now they find themselves vociferously arguing a point, or taking a key role in a dynamic discussion, surprised at their own confidence and fluency. The boost is tremendous; it could literally change the course of the student’s education, and lead to exciting possibilities.

Role-play allows a class to debate a sensitive or controversial point without the bruising emotional experience of expressing a minority opinion or putting their reputation on the line. Rather than dealing with genuine and weighty real-world issues, we can use imagination and a convincing ‘man-made’ environment to emulate reality, like in a movie or video game. Such environments are infinitely flexible, permitting customization and nuance which respond to our students’ beliefs, provoke debate in an unthreatening format, and invite everyone to participate equally.

There are no limits to how a role-play might operate. The students might be defending a policy, or trying to persuade their group to accept change. It could be a life or death decision. Or it could just be the advocating of a new technology they think would sell well. Perhaps they’re representing a badly treated jungle tribe, or a maligned CEO, reeling from the latest scandal. They could take the role of a historical figure, or a contemporary leader, or someone not yet born. Creating these environments has been one of the most enjoyable and productive aspects of my ESL career.

Inventing your own role-plays is time-consuming, and demands care and attention, but once created, you’ll have a superb platform for genuine and passionate student interaction. Students who might be shy of airing their own views, and therefore not likely to produce as much as we’d like, find themselves in a safe place, and with a role they can embody by actually maximizing their production. Learners who are used to a single point of view, or who are trained in black-and-white thinking, can find themselves challenged to embody the opposite view, and to engage with the nuances of those oh-so-important gray areas. The role-play itself becomes a valuable, shared experience which aids integration and unity within the class. I really can’t recommend this enough: try the steps below, and create your own role-play.

Consider Your Class

What interests them? What gets them talking? Listen for issues which come up repeatedly, or cause debate or disagreement. Tap into the students’ hobbies and backgrounds, the subjects they’re planning to study at college, or topics raised in movies they’ve recently seen.

Select a Skills Area

Review what they already know and focus on one or two skills which either need review, or have yet to flourish. Consider recent language points – tenses, modals, conditionals, plurals, comparisons, measure expressions, modifiers, etc – and assess which of these might both benefit from review and might usefully be practiced in a role-play environment. Here are some possibilities, with ‘meta-questions’ to help you choose a particular narrative or role-play context:

Try These 4 Methods for Creating Super Engaging Role-plays

1

Group Decision Making
- Which policy should we choose?
- Which person should we hire?
- Which of these choices is the most efficient / risky / popular / profitable?
- How can we make sure everyone benefits from this policy?
- What regulations are needed to keep this community safe?
- Which version of this idea is the best / most appropriate / least dangerous?
Grammar points might include:
- Comparatives; “This solution to this crisis is better than the UN idea, because...”
- Language for agreement and disagreement; “How can you support the new fishing law, when...”
- Modifiers and adjectives; “This proposal is outstanding, but this one is absolutely terrible.”
2

Negotiation:
- How can we solve this problem together?
- How can we share these resources most equitably?
- How can we develop trust between our two groups?
- How should we appropriately compensate these people?
- How should this group of visitors spend their time in the best way?
Grammar points will include:
- Agreement and disagreement; “That may look like a good solution, but I think...”
- Requesting and persuading; “This proposal is not well balanced, but would you consider...”
- Prioritizing and balancing; “That’s significant, but it is far more important that we address...
3

Design:
- Which kind of marketing would appeal to this target group?
- What style of syllabus is appropriate for these students?
- How should we spend time on this outing?
- How should we organize this exhibition?
- Which building style is the most environmentally friendly?
Grammar points might include:
- Adjectives and metaphors; “If it’s a rounder shape it might seem more friendly...”
- Objections and persuasion; “I’m not sure that’ll get the message across, but what about...”
- Comparatives; “That seems a more efficient way than the first one we thought of...”
4

Representing a Character:

Depending on the role-play context, students could take a character and express their point of view. Examples could include:
- A Business Role-play: Manager, employee, accountant, consultant, safety officer, PR specialist
- A Technology Role-play: Designer, sales director, consumer consultant, researcher
- A Politics/Government Role-play: President, cabinet member, activist, journalist, cleric, scientist
- A Crisis Management Role-play: Local mayor, police chief, victim, regulator, lawyer

Examples:

One of my favorite role-play tasks was to create four fictional cities, each with different characteristics, and have the students decide which one would be most suitable to hold an Olympic Games. One had a crime problem, another had a substandard transport network, another had problems with protestors from a local ethnic group, etc. Once the situation was analyzed, groups represented each city in a bid to persuade the IOC (their teacher) to vote for them, and to discredit the other cities.

Another favorite was a complex negotiation between two countries who are on the brink of war. Long-term mistrust and continual skirmishing is (hopefully!) put aside while issues such as sharing resources, allowing access to a holy site, forming a non-aggression treaty and arranging a technology exchange are discussed. The final package was a nuanced mix of give and take, spiced up by the two groups having deliberately lied to each other on crucial points. It never fails to arouse passions and lead to huge amounts of language production.